Unpacking the Differences: LoRa vs LoRaWAN

lora lorawan

Share This Post

LoRa vs LoRaWAN, where do you start? LoRa and LoRaWAN are two related wireless communication technologies that share some similarities but also have notable differences. In this response, we will discuss the differences between LoRa and LoRaWAN in detail.

LoRa vs LoRaWAN – what are the differences?

Definition and Purpose:

1.) LoRa (Long Range) is a proprietary wireless communication technology developed by Semtech Corporation that provides long-range, low-power wireless connectivity for IoT (Internet of Things) devices. LoRa enables communication over distances of several kilometres in urban environments and up to tens of kilometres in rural areas while consuming very little power.

2.) LoRaWAN (Long Range Wide Area Network) is an open standard developed by the LoRa Alliance that defines the communication protocol and network architecture for LoRa-based IoT networks. LoRaWAN is designed to provide long-range, low-power connectivity for IoT devices in a scalable and secure manner, enabling a wide range of IoT applications, including smart cities, smart agriculture, and industrial automation.

LoRa vs LoRaWAN – Operating Principle:

1.) LoRa uses chirp spread spectrum (CSS) modulation, a type of frequency modulation that spreads the signal over a wide bandwidth to increase the range of the transmission and reduce the impact of interference. LoRa operates in the license-free sub-gigahertz bands (868 MHz, 915 MHz, 433 MHz), which provide better penetration through obstacles and longer range than higher frequency bands.

2.) LoRaWAN uses the same CSS modulation as LoRa, but adds a MAC (Media Access Control) layer and a network layer on top of it. The MAC layer manages access to the shared radio channel, ensuring that multiple devices can communicate in a coordinated manner without interference. The network layer provides routing and security functions, enabling communication between LoRaWAN devices and gateways, and between gateways and network servers.

LoRa vs LoRaWAN – Network Topology:

1.) LoRa supports point-to-point and point-to-multipoint communication, allowing a LoRa device to communicate directly with another LoRa device or with a LoRa gateway. LoRa devices can also operate in a star topology, where multiple devices communicate with a central gateway.

2.) LoRaWAN is designed for large-scale IoT networks that cover wide geographical areas. LoRaWAN networks use a star-of-stars topology, where multiple gateways are deployed in a region and communicate with a network server in the cloud. LoRaWAN devices send their data to the nearest gateway, which forwards the data to the network server for processing and storage.

LoRa vs LoRaWAN – Power Consumption:

1.) LoRa is optimized for low power consumption, allowing devices to operate for several years on a single battery. LoRa devices use a duty cycle approach, where they transmit for short periods of time at regular intervals, and then enter sleep mode to conserve power.

2.) LoRaWAN devices are also designed for low power consumption, but their power consumption depends on the frequency and duration of their transmissions. LoRaWAN devices use adaptive data rate (ADR) and channel hopping techniques to optimize their transmission parameters and reduce interference, while maintaining a reliable communication link.

LoRa vs LoRaWAN – Security:

1.) LoRa provides basic security features such as data encryption and device authentication, but does not provide end-to-end security for the entire communication chain.

2.) LoRaWAN provides end-to-end security for the entire communication chain, from the device to the network server. LoRaWAN uses AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) encryption for data protection, and implements device authentication, message integrity, and replay protection mechanisms to prevent unauthorized access and data tampering

LoRa vs LoRaWAN – Applications:

1.) LoRa is suitable for a wide range of IoT applications that require long-range and low-power wireless connectivity, such as smart agriculture, smart cities, and asset tracking.

2.) LoRaWAN is particularly well-suited for large-scale IoT applications that require long-range, low-power connectivity, and secure communication, such as smart metering, environmental monitoring, and industrial automation. LoRaWAN networks can be deployed in both urban and rural areas and can support a large number of devices, ranging from a few hundred to several thousand.

LoRa vs LoRaWAN – Compatibility and Availability:

1.) LoRa is a proprietary technology developed by Semtech Corporation, and requires the use of Semtech’s hardware and software components. However, Semtech has licensed LoRa technology to a number of companies and organizations, enabling a growing ecosystem of LoRa-based products and services.

2.) LoRaWAN is an open standard developed by the LoRa Alliance, a non-profit organization that promotes the adoption and interoperability of LoRaWAN technology. The LoRa Alliance has more than 500 members, including hardware manufacturers, software vendors, and service providers, and has certified more than 1600 LoRaWAN products.

LoRa vs LoRaWAN – Cost:

1.) LoRa technology is relatively low-cost compared to other wireless communication technologies, and can be a cost-effective solution for IoT applications that require long-range and low-power connectivity. LoRa devices can be purchased for less than $10 per unit, and LoRaWAN gateways can be purchased for less than $500.

2.) LoRaWAN technology can be more expensive than LoRa, as it requires the use of additional hardware and software components to implement the MAC and network layers. However, the cost of LoRaWAN devices and gateways has been decreasing over time, as the technology becomes more widespread and the economies of scale kick in.

In summary, LoRa and LoRaWAN are two related wireless communication technologies that share some similarities, such as the use of CSS modulation and low-power operation, but also have significant differences in terms of network topology, security, and compatibility. LoRa is a proprietary technology developed by Semtech Corporation, while LoRaWAN is an open standard developed by the LoRa Alliance. LoRa is suitable for a wide range of IoT applications, while LoRaWAN is particularly well-suited for large-scale IoT applications that require long-range, low-power connectivity, and secure communication. The choice between LoRa and LoRaWAN depends on the specific requirements of the IoT application and should be carefully evaluated based on factors such as range, power consumption, security, and cost.

Additional resources: LoRa Alliance

Why not have a peek at our Knowledge Centre while you are here?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Post by:

Share This Post

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best

More To Explore

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get updates and learn from the best